So the UK is to get a Citizenship Test. This strikes me as a good idea, except for one thing. It's not going to prevent employers from giving jobs to people whose grasp of the English language is a little on the suspect side. Now in jobs where the employee doesn't have to do much talking, this isn't really a problem. It's when communication comes into play that I have issues. The thing is, there's so much 'positive discrimination' about that its deemed politically incorrect not to give jobs to people who can't spreche la lingo. If I go into a shop and ask for something, I expect to be understood. If I'm on the 'phone, I expect to be understood. I am a fluent English speaker, and, quite reasonably given that the majority of inhabitants of this country are also fluent English speakers, I expect to deal with a fluent English speaker when I'm carrying out a transaction that involves spoken communication (within this country, of course).
So, indeed, whilst a Citizenship Test might well help those immigrants who are willing to work hard and integrate themselves, it's not going to be of benefit to those who've got in, got a job, and are confusing and annoying the heck out of Joe Public because they don't understand what he's saying.
So, indeed, whilst a Citizenship Test might well help those immigrants who are willing to work hard and integrate themselves, it's not going to be of benefit to those who've got in, got a job, and are confusing and annoying the heck out of Joe Public because they don't understand what he's saying.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
(We've got an analogous problem in the States. Shop assistants seem to be OK, but delivery men, gardeners, home help etc generally have very poor English. Strictly espaƱol.)
We have a test to become a citizen as well: it tends to mean that naturalized adults remember more about US history than their American-born neighbors (who last studied it in high school, if they were paying attention at all!)
From:
no subject
From:
no subject